Penn v. State

943 So. 2d 249, 2006 WL 3210011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Penn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 941 So. 2d 466
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2006·No. 3D06-2182·Published

Opinion

943 So.2d 249 (2006)

Patrick PENN, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-2182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 8, 2006.

Patrick Penn, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for a hearing or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penn v. State, 943 So. 2d 249, 2006 WL 3210011 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

943 So. 2d 249 (Penn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.