Penn v. Commonwealth

420 S.E.2d 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Penn v. Commonwealth. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 Va. 218
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided September 18, 1992·No. Record No. 920043·Published

Opinion

420 S.E.2d 713 (1992)

George Dennis PENN, III
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.

Record No. 920043.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

September 18, 1992.

William R. Light, Lynchburg, for appellant.

Eugene Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee.

Present: CARRICO, C.J., COMPTON, STEPHENSON, WHITING, LACY, and HASSELL, JJ., and POFF, Senior Justice.

PER CURIAM.

We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress evidence seized during a search made pursuant to an unlawful misdemeanor arrest.

We have considered the question, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 13 Va.App. 399,412 S.E.2d 189 (1991), we will affirm its judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penn v. Commonwealth, 420 S.E.2d 713 (Va. 1992).

420 S.E.2d 713 (Penn v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penn v. Commonwealth
412 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1991)