Penn v. Baily

Indiana Supreme Court

Penn v. Baily

150 N.E.2d 571, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 285

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 1958

DocketNo. 0-516

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.E.2d 571 (Penn v. Baily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penn v. Baily, 150 N.E.2d 571, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 285 (Ind. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus against the respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party seeking the relief. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition.

For the reasons stated the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 571.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus against the respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party seeking the relief. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition.

For the reasons stated the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 571.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.E.2d 571, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penn-v-baily-ind-1958.