Penn v. Baily

Indiana Supreme Court

Penn v. Baily

150 N.E.2d 571, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 285

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1958·No. No. 0-516·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus against the respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party seeking the relief. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition.

For the reasons stated the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 571.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus against the respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party seeking the relief. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition.

For the reasons stated the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 571.

Penn v. Baily, 150 N.E.2d 571, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 285 (Ind. 1958).

Pincite

150 N.E.2d 571 (Penn v. Baily) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.