Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

39 N.E.2d 745, 139 Ohio St. 262, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 262, 22 Ohio Op. 277, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 516
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 4, 1942
Docket28904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 N.E.2d 745 (Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 39 N.E.2d 745, 139 Ohio St. 262, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 262, 22 Ohio Op. 277, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 516 (Ohio 1942).

Opinion

By the Court.

Section 496, G-eneral Code, requires *264 the secretary of the Public Utilities Commission to keep a full and complete record of all proceedings of the commission.

Section 544, General Code, provides that a final order made lay the commission may be reversed, vacated or modified by this court on appeal, if upon consideration of the record this court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.

Section 547, General Code, bars such appeal “unless * * * filed within sixty days after the entry of the final order complained of upon the journal of the commission.” (Italics ours.)

This court has held that an oral announcement or placing in the files of a signed memorandum granting a certificate and stating when it should take effect, does not bar the commission from making further investigation or from modifying such memorandum before entering a final order upon its journal and issuing a certificate. Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 119 Ohio St., 264, 163 N. E., 713, paragraph 2 of the syllabus. See, also, Penna. Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 123 Ohio St., 203, 174 N. E., 737.

No final order has been entered by the commission on its journal. That is apparent from an examination of the stipulated facts.

The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neylon v. Nebraska State Railway Commission
38 N.W.2d 552 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.E.2d 745, 139 Ohio St. 262, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 262, 22 Ohio Op. 277, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penn-ohio-coach-lines-co-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1942.