Penn-Mar-Florida Corp. v. Deis

Supreme Court of Florida

Penn-Mar-Florida Corp. v. Deis

160 So. 191, 118 Fla. 766, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1773

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 So. 191 (Penn-Mar-Florida Corp. v. Deis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penn-Mar-Florida Corp. v. Deis, 160 So. 191, 118 Fla. 766, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1773 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In foreclosure proceedings it appears that when the complainant took an assignment of the mortgage he had or reasonably should have had notice or knowledge from records, occupancy of the lots and other circumstances,, that Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 of Block B of Orange Crest Subdivision, being a subdivision of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4, Section 23, Township 33 S., Range 28 E., Highlands County, Florida, which were included in the mortgage, were occupied and were involved in a controversy as to their release from the mortgage. As to such lots the decree for the complainant is reversed and in other respects the decree is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In foreclosure proceedings it appears that when the complainant took an assignment of the mortgage he had or reasonably should have had notice or knowledge from records, occupancy of the lots and other circumstances,, that Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 of Block B of Orange Crest Subdivision, being a subdivision of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4, Section 23, Township 33 S., Range 28 E., Highlands County, Florida, which were included in the mortgage, were occupied and were involved in a controversy as to their release from the mortgage. As to such lots the decree for the complainant is reversed and in other respects the decree is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 191, 118 Fla. 766, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penn-mar-florida-corp-v-deis-fla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack