Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc.
334 S.E.2d 391, 314 N.C. 528, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2014
Opinion
This was an action to recover commissions allegedly due plaintiff as a result of a contract between plaintiff and defendant. *529 The facts of this case are fully and accurately set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals and need not be repeated herein.
After reviewing the records and briefs and hearing the oral argument question presented by this appeal, we conclude that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is correct and should be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc., 334 S.E.2d 391, 314 N.C. 528, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2014 (N.C. 1985).
334 S.E.2d 391 (Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burton v. Williams
689 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. Hall
433 S.E.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
First American Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Adams
360 S.E.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)