Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc.
This text of 334 S.E.2d 391 (Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action to recover commissions allegedly due plaintiff as a result of a contract between plaintiff and defendant. *529 The facts of this case are fully and accurately set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals and need not be repeated herein.
After reviewing the records and briefs and hearing the oral argument question presented by this appeal, we conclude that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is correct and should be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 S.E.2d 391, 314 N.C. 528, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penn-compression-moulding-inc-v-mar-bal-inc-nc-1985.