Penland v. . Gowan

50 S.E.2d 182, 229 N.C. 449, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 10, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the pleadings in this cause discloses that a writ of injunction is the only relief sought by plaintiffs. The only issue of fact raised in the pleadings is directed to the right of the plaintiffs to this relief. The election they seek to enjoin was held 31 August, 1948, and is now an accomplished fact. Hence, the questions plaintiffs seek to present on this appeal are academic. For that reason, the appeal is dismissed on authority of Eller v. Wall, ante, 359, and the cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penland v. . Gowan, 50 S.E.2d 182, 229 N.C. 449, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 1948).

50 S.E.2d 182 (Penland v. . Gowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratcliff v. Rodman
127 S.E.2d 788 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Green v. Briggs
92 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Ferguson v. Riddle
62 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)