Penland v. Governor of South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Penland v. Governor of South Carolina

308 F. App'x 670

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2009·No. No. 08-1926·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Pen-land appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Penland v. Governor of S.C., No. 6:07-cv-03241-HMH, 2008 WL 3834025 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Pen-land appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Penland v. Governor of S.C., No. 6:07-cv-03241-HMH, 2008 WL 3834025 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Penland v. Governor of South Carolina, 308 F. App'x 670 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

308 F. App'x 670 (Penland v. Governor of South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.