Penland v. County of Spartanburg

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 25, 2008
• Docket: 08-1925
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1925

CHARLES W. PENLAND, Sr.; MARY PENLAND, Wife,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver; RMC OFFICE OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:07-cv-03288-HMH)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland appeal the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Penland v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:07-

cv-03288-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED