Penland v. Carolina First Bank
This text of Penland v. Carolina First Bank (Penland v. Carolina First Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7987
CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLINA FIRST BANK; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its appointed trustee; BONDING COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:07-cv-03109-HMH)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Penland, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Penland, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Penland v. Carolina
First Bank, No. 6:07-cv-03109-HMH (D.S.C. Sept. 10, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Penland v. Carolina First Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penland-v-carolina-first-bank-ca4-2008.