Penland v. Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7096

CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BUREAU OF PRISONS; SUNASINI N. SHAH, Dr., M.D.; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; ONG, Medical Director, M.D.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01263-LO-TCB)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Penland, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Dan Edward Stigall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Penland, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his requests for preliminary injunctions. On

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Penland’s brief

alleges no error committed by the district court. We therefore

find Penland has forfeited appellate review of that order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED