Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Penko v. Lake Cty.

Penko v. Lake Cty.

825 N.E.2d 619, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 13, 2005
Docket2005-0225
StatusPublished

This text of 825 N.E.2d 619 (Penko v. Lake Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penko v. Lake Cty., 825 N.E.2d 619, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss and motion for leave to amend complaint. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for leave to amend complaint denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 N.E.2d 619, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penko-v-lake-cty-ohio-2005.