Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Penko v. Lake Cty.

Penko v. Lake Cty.

825 N.E.2d 619, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 13, 2005·No. 2005-0225·Published

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss and motion for leave to amend complaint. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for leave to amend complaint denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penko v. Lake Cty., 825 N.E.2d 619, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 2005).

825 N.E.2d 619 (Penko v. Lake Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.