Penkala v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Penkala v. City of Chicago

153 Ill. App. 337, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 968

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 18, 1910

DocketGen. No. 14,915

StatusPublished

This text of 153 Ill. App. 337 (Penkala v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penkala v. City of Chicago, 153 Ill. App. 337, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 968 (Ill. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since this case was submitted, the Supreme Court has held in Walters v. City of Ottawa, 240 Ill. 259, that the plea of the statute of limitations is a good defense to a declaration in a cause of action for negligence against a city, amended after the statutory period had run by reciting that the statutory notice was duly .given.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI