Peninsula Terminal Co. v. Sterling

151 So. 520, 113 Fla. 103
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1933
Docket2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 So. 520 (Peninsula Terminal Co. v. Sterling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peninsula Terminal Co. v. Sterling, 151 So. 520, 113 Fla. 103 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Peninsula Terminal Company v. Zaring, et ux., this day decided, ■the issues involved and the decree appealed from, being in substance of the same character.

For the reasons pointed out in the opinion in the case of Peninsula Terminal Company v. Zaring, supra, the decree herein is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause ■remanded' to the- Circuit Court with directions to enter an amended final decree for complainant in such form as to ■eliminate therefrom • all allowance to complainant for in-terest on the moneys adjudged to be returned to him, except ■interest from the date of the-institution of this suit in the court below. The costs of this appeal will for the same reasons be charged against the appellant and appellee in equal proportions. Mandate to issue accordingly.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, J. J., concur. J J ’

Buford, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberson v. Bondurant
73 P.2d 321 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 520, 113 Fla. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peninsula-terminal-co-v-sterling-fla-1933.