Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.
437 N.E.2d 1155, 56 N.Y.2d 794, 452 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3440
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. Respondent’s claims with respect to the arbitrator’s refusal to grant an adjournment and his refusal to accept certain evidence raise no cognizable objection to the arbitration award, given our narrow scope of review (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [i]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc., 437 N.E.2d 1155, 56 N.Y.2d 794, 452 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3440 (N.Y. 1982).
437 N.E.2d 1155 (Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Landau v. Stracquadaine
142 Misc. 2d 30 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Sheet Asphalt Workers Local Union No. 1018 v. Perez Interboro Asphalt Co.
122 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Harwyn Luggage, Inc. v. Henry Rosenfeld, Inc.
90 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)