Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.
This text of 437 N.E.2d 1155 (Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. Respondent’s claims with respect to the arbitrator’s refusal to grant an adjournment and his refusal to accept certain evidence raise no cognizable objection to the arbitration award, given our narrow scope of review (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [i]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 N.E.2d 1155, 56 N.Y.2d 794, 452 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peninsula-national-bank-v-joseph-m-turecamo-inc-ny-1982.