Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
187 So. 2d 441, 249 La. 459
This text of 187 So. 2d 441 (Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 187 So. 2d 441, 249 La. 459 (La. 1966).
Opinion
In re: Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 187 So.2d 128.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
187 So. 2d 128 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 So. 2d 441, 249 La. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peninger-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-la-1966.