Penigar, Mark Hagger
Opinion
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS JEFFERSON COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3 and 68.4(i), because the petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Filed: March 5, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penigar, Mark Hagger (Penigar, Mark Hagger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.