Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York
248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 409, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1628
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York, 248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 409, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1628 (1918).
248 U.S. 537 (Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
246 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)