Home/Supreme Court/Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York

Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York

248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 409, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1628
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 18, 1918
DocketNo. 46
StatusPublished

This text of 248 U.S. 537 (Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York, 248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 409, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1628 (1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
246 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 409, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penfold-v-travis-ex-rel-new-york-scotus-1918.