Penfield v. Murray Hill Holding Corp.
115 N.E.2d 830, 306 N.Y. 602
Opinion
Jean N. Penfield, Individually and on Behalf of All the Tenants of 211 East 35th Street, Borough of Manhattan, Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
Murray Hill Holding Corp., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Jean Nelson Penfield, appellant in person.
Leo Praeger for respondent.
Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, J. Taking no part: VAN VOORHIS, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penfield v. Murray Hill Holding Corp., 115 N.E.2d 830, 306 N.Y. 602 (N.Y. 1953).
115 N.E.2d 830 (Penfield v. Murray Hill Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Islip v. Zalak
165 A.D.2d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Committee for the Preservation of Fresh Meadows, Inc. v. Fresh Meadows Associates
93 Misc. 2d 529 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Elkort v. 490 West End Avenue Co.
38 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Mandle v. Brown
4 A.D.2d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Barbee v. 2639 Corp.
284 A.D. 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)