Penfield v. Carpender

13 Johns. 350
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 350 (Penfield v. Carpender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penfield v. Carpender, 13 Johns. 350 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

.Per-Curiam.

The admission of such testimony, was illegal and dangerous, and no subsequent caution or advice by the justice,-that the jury ought to. disregard'what the witnesses had sworn', can cure .the irregularity. • The law forbids such testimo;ny, hecaiise it mayAaiie anánfluence upon honest jurors, .who aré unconscious of the impressions which- they retain, inotwith^ standing;.the'effort of the court to obliterate-then}.' V. "

The tazation 'of costs .was alsoillegab

Judgmeht-reversedt-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seckerson v. Sinclair
140 N.W. 239 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Chicago City Railway Co. v. White
110 Ill. App. 23 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Brown v. State
34 S.E. 1031 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
State v. Rover
10 Nev. 388 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1875)
Meyer v. Clark
2 Daly 497 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Long v. Allen
2 Fla. 403 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1849)
Clark v. Crandall
3 Barb. 612 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Allen v. Town of Hancock
16 Vt. 230 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)
Hamblett v. Hamblett
6 N.H. 333 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)
Tuttle v. Hunt
2 Cow. 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penfield-v-carpender-nysupct-1816.