Pendry v. Brundridge
57 Ala. 574
This text of 57 Ala. 574 (Pendry v. Brundridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pendry v. Brundridge, 57 Ala. 574 (Ala. 1877).
Opinion
Money paid by mistake, may be recovered •back on a count for money had and received.—Rutherford v. McIvor, 21 Ala. 750; Walker v. Meek, 39 Ala. 568.
The facts testified to by plaintiff, and not disputed by defendant, made a clear case of estoppel against the defendant, and fully justified the charge given.—1 Brick. Dig. 796, §§ 9, 10, 11; Morris v. Hall, 41 Ala. 510.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rutherford v. McIvor
21 Ala. 750 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Walker v. Mock's Administrator
39 Ala. 568 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1865)
Morris v. Hall
41 Ala. 510 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 Ala. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendry-v-brundridge-ala-1877.