Pendry v. Brundridge
57 Ala. 574
Opinion
Money paid by mistake, may be recovered •back on a count for money had and received.—Rutherford v. McIvor, 21 Ala. 750; Walker v. Meek, 39 Ala. 568.
The facts testified to by plaintiff, and not disputed by defendant, made a clear case of estoppel against the defendant, and fully justified the charge given.—1 Brick. Dig. 796, §§ 9, 10, 11; Morris v. Hall, 41 Ala. 510.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pendry v. Brundridge, 57 Ala. 574 (Ala. 1877).
57 Ala. 574 (Pendry v. Brundridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutherford v. McIvor
21 Ala. 750 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Walker v. Mock's Administrator
39 Ala. 568 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1865)
Morris v. Hall
41 Ala. 510 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)