Pendleton v. Thompson

5 F. App'x 273
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 13, 2001·No. 00-6346·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lewis L. Pendleton, II, a Virginia prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action asserting that the Virginia Parole Board violated the Ex Post Facto Clause when, upon revoking his parole, it likewise revoked his previously earned good time credits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pendleton’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Pendleton v. Thompson, No. CA-99-291 (W.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2000); see also Warren v. Baskerville, 233 F.3d 204 (4th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pendleton v. Thompson, 5 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2001).

5 F. App'x 273 (Pendleton v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglas Warren v. Alton Baskerville
233 F.3d 204 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)