Pendleton v. State
785 S.W.2d 648, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 93, 1990 WL 4137
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Robert Pendleton, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(i). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pendleton v. State, 785 S.W.2d 648, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 93, 1990 WL 4137 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
785 S.W.2d 648 (Pendleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.