Pendleton v. Millington

400 A.2d 353, 1979 Me. LEXIS 583
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided April 17, 1979·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Donald E. and Anne M. Millington (defendants) have appealed from a Waldo County Superior Court grant of partial summary judgment, made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), M.R.Civ.P. on August 8,1978, by which they were ordered to convey, pursuant to their obligations under a “Bond for a Deed,” a certain parcel of land to Virgil D. and Estelle F. Pendleton (plaintiffs).

Since the only factual disputes asserted to remain for adjudication concern conditions which this Court has designated “not independently viable” under such a bond (Perkins v. Penney, Me., 387 A.2d 205, 208 (1978)), none can qualify as a “genuine issue as to any material fact” within the meaning of Rule 56(c), M.R.Civ.P.

This case falls squarely within the holding of Perkins, supra, and is controlled thereby.

The entry will be:

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Remanded to the Superior Court, Waldo County, for further proceedings.

WERNICK and NICHOLS, JJ., did not sit.

DUFRESNE, A. R. J., sat by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pendleton v. Millington, 400 A.2d 353, 1979 Me. LEXIS 583 (Me. 1979).

400 A.2d 353 (Pendleton v. Millington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perkins v. Penney
387 A.2d 205 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)