Pendleton v. Colville

49 Tex. 525
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gould, Associate Justice.

The amended petition set up a new cause of action, and as the plaintiffs in error had no notice, actual or constructive, thereof, it was error to render a judgment founded on the matters alleged in the amendment. (Furlow v. Miller, 30 Tex., 29; De Walt v. Snow, 25 Tex., 321; Morrison v. Walker, 22 Tex., 19; Weatherford v. Van Alstyne, 22 Tex., 22.)

The assignment of errors fails to specify this as a ground of error, but it is one which is apparent on the record, and is so fundamental, that the court will act upon it, though not assigned.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pendleton v. Colville, 49 Tex. 525 (Tex. 1878).

49 Tex. 525 (Pendleton v. Colville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooney v. Van Deren
182 S.W. 1190 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)