Pendleton v. Colville
This text of 49 Tex. 525 (Pendleton v. Colville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The amended petition set up a new cause of action, and as the plaintiffs in error had no notice, actual or constructive, thereof, it was error to render a judgment founded on the matters alleged in the amendment. (Furlow v. Miller, 30 Tex., 29; De Walt v. Snow, 25 Tex., 321; Morrison v. Walker, 22 Tex., 19; Weatherford v. Van Alstyne, 22 Tex., 22.)
The assignment of errors fails to specify this as a ground of error, but it is one which is apparent on the record, and is so fundamental, that the court will act upon it, though not assigned.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Tex. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendleton-v-colville-tex-1878.