Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny
This text of Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny (Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON, : No. 77 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : ALLEGHENY COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Application to Expedite are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that
hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendleton-m-pet-v-ccp-allegheny-pa-2017.