Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 2017·No. 77 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

MICHAEL J. PENDLETON, : No. 77 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : ALLEGHENY COUNTY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Application to Expedite are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that

hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the

filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny, (Pa. 2017).

Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny (Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)