Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON, : No. 77 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : ALLEGHENY COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Application to Expedite are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that
hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny (Pendleton, M., Pet v. CCP Allegheny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.