Pendergrass v. Hardman
This text of 121 S.E. 808 (Pendergrass v. Hardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. As a general rule an administrator’s deed to land is inadmissible as evidence of title, unless accompanied by evidence of an order from the court of ordinary authorizing such sale. Yahoola River Mining Co. v. Irby, 40 Ga. 479 (3); Waller v. Hogan, 114 Ga. 383 (40 S. E. 254); Brown v. Madden, 141 Ga. 419 (2) (81 S. E. 196).
2. The evidence brought up in the record in this case is not of such character as to establish an estoppel in favor of the claimant who was the purchaser at the administrator’s sale, as against the plaintiff in fi. fa.; and for this reason we can not say that the administrator’s deed was admissible in connection with other evidence to show such estoppel.
(a) Allegations of fact contained in the equitable plea in aid of the claim, to which no answer was made, can not be considered as evidence, and proof thereof should be made in order to sustain such equitable amendment.
3. Under application of the principles announced in the preceding notes, it was error to refuse a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 S.E. 808, 157 Ga. 579, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendergrass-v-hardman-ga-1924.