Pendergrass v. Burris

19 P. 187, 3 Cal. Unrep. 22, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 967
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 1888
DocketNo. 12,509
StatusPublished

This text of 19 P. 187 (Pendergrass v. Burris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pendergrass v. Burris, 19 P. 187, 3 Cal. Unrep. 22, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 967 (Cal. 1888).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case turns upon the question whether or not a certain deed was intended to be a mortgage. The court below found that it was not a mortgage. The ingenious argument of counsel for the appellant has cast some doubt-upon the correctness of this conclusion. Nevertheless, upon the evidence in the record, we do not feel warranted to declare that the court below erred in its decision. The judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 P. 187, 3 Cal. Unrep. 22, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendergrass-v-burris-cal-1888.