Pendergrass v. Burris
This text of 19 P. 187 (Pendergrass v. Burris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case turns upon the question whether or not a certain deed was intended to be a mortgage. The court below found that it was not a mortgage. The ingenious argument of counsel for the appellant has cast some doubt-upon the correctness of this conclusion. Nevertheless, upon the evidence in the record, we do not feel warranted to declare that the court below erred in its decision. The judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 P. 187, 3 Cal. Unrep. 22, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendergrass-v-burris-cal-1888.