Pendergast v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
198 A.D.2d 886, 605 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1993
StatusPublished
This text of 198 A.D.2d 886 (Pendergast v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pendergast v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 198 A.D.2d 886, 605 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with same Memorandum as in Wylie v Consolidated Rail Corp. (198 AD2d 884 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wylie v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
198 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
198 A.D.2d 886, 605 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendergast-v-consolidated-rail-corp-nyappdiv-1993.