Pender v. State

847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2003 WL 21459566
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2003
DocketNo. 3D02-2659
StatusPublished

This text of 847 So. 2d 1141 (Pender v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pender v. State, 847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2003 WL 21459566 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Pender appeals his conviction for purchase or possession with intent to purchase cocaine. We conclude that the trial court’s evidentiary ruling was consistent with section 90.614, Florida Statutes (2002); see also Charles W. Ehrhardt Florida Evidence § 614.1, at 565 (2002), and accordingly affirm the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2003 WL 21459566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pender-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.