Pender County v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pender County v. Bartlett

633 S.E.2d 90, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 192, 2006 WL 1621727

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pender County v. Bartlett. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 N.C. 491 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 10, 2006·No. No. 103A06.·Published

Opinion

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior and Mary Jordan for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(l). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2006."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior and Mary Jordan for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(l). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2006."

Pender County v. Bartlett, 633 S.E.2d 90, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 192, 2006 WL 1621727 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

633 S.E.2d 90 (Pender County v. Bartlett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.