Pender County v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pender County v. Bartlett

633 S.E.2d 90, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 192, 2006 WL 1621727

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 10, 2006

DocketNo. 103A06.

StatusPublished

This text of 633 S.E.2d 90 (Pender County v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pender County v. Bartlett, 633 S.E.2d 90, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 192, 2006 WL 1621727 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior and Mary Jordan for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(l). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2006."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior and Mary Jordan for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(l). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2006."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

633 S.E.2d 90, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 192, 2006 WL 1621727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pender-county-v-bartlett-nc-2006.