Pence v. Big Lost River Irrigation District

364 P.2d 158, 83 Idaho 393, 1961 Ida. LEXIS 196
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1961
DocketNo. 8967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 364 P.2d 158 (Pence v. Big Lost River Irrigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pence v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 364 P.2d 158, 83 Idaho 393, 1961 Ida. LEXIS 196 (Idaho 1961).

Opinion

KNUDSON, Justice.

By virtue and under the authority of the decision filed this date in the case of Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 83 Idaho 374, 364 P.2d 146, the judgment for damages entered by the trial court in favor of respondents in this action is affirmed. The order of injunction is set aside. No costs allowed.

TAYLÓR, C. J., and SMITH, Mc-QUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation District
364 P.2d 146 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
364 P.2d 158, 83 Idaho 393, 1961 Ida. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pence-v-big-lost-river-irrigation-district-idaho-1961.