Pence-Brodsky v. Brodsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pence-Brodsky v. Brodsky

249 A.D.2d 398, 670 N.Y.S.2d 369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 398 (Pence-Brodsky v. Brodsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pence-Brodsky v. Brodsky, 249 A.D.2d 398, 670 N.Y.S.2d 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child [399]*399custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), entered May 1, 1997, as, upon her motion to resettle an order of the same court dated February 18, 1997, which was based upon the parties’ stipulation of settlement, resettled the prior order so as to award the respondent father a period of visitation in the month of January as an alternative to his period of visitation in the month of December.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The record indicates that the order entered May 1, 1997, conforms to the parties’ stipulation entered into in open court on January 8, 1997. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child [399]*399custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), entered May 1, 1997, as, upon her motion to resettle an order of the same court dated February 18, 1997, which was based upon the parties’ stipulation of settlement, resettled the prior order so as to award the respondent father a period of visitation in the month of January as an alternative to his period of visitation in the month of December.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The record indicates that the order entered May 1, 1997, conforms to the parties’ stipulation entered into in open court on January 8, 1997. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 398, 670 N.Y.S.2d 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pence-brodsky-v-brodsky-nyappdiv-1998.