Penberthy v. MINERAL AREA OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL & LAURENCE LUM, DO

295 S.W.3d 557, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 11, 2009
DocketED 92111
StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.W.3d 557 (Penberthy v. MINERAL AREA OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL & LAURENCE LUM, DO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penberthy v. MINERAL AREA OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL & LAURENCE LUM, DO, 295 S.W.3d 557, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant April Penberthy appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, the Honorable Kenneth W. Pratte presiding. The Honorable Kenneth W. Pratte granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, Mineral Area Osteopathic Hospital & Laurence Lum. Penberthy appeals, raising three issues: 1) whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to Lum’s alleged breach of the standard of care; 2) whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to causation; and 3) whether the trial court of St. Louis County erred in transferring venue to St. Francois County.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.3d 557, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penberthy-v-mineral-area-osteopathic-hospital-laurence-lum-do-moctapp-2009.