Penave v. State

697 So. 2d 1021, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9477, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1976
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1997·No. No. 97-2099·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Adres Penave, defendant, appeals his conviction and sentence for direct criminal contempt. The State concedes that the trial court did not comply with the procedures set forth in Fla. R.Crim. 3.380 and discussed in Cook v. State, 636 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

We reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence, and remand for a new hearing.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penave v. State, 697 So. 2d 1021, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9477, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 1021 (Penave v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. State
636 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)