Penaloza v. Hubbert

Fourth Circuit

Penaloza v. Hubbert

595 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2015·No. No. 14-7427·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgilio Penaloza appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgilio Penaloza appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Penaloza v. Hubbert, 595 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

595 F. App'x 248 (Penaloza v. Hubbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.