Penaloza v. Hubbert

Fourth Circuit

Penaloza v. Hubbert

595 F. App'x 248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 2015

DocketNo. 14-7427

StatusPublished

This text of 595 F. App'x 248 (Penaloza v. Hubbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penaloza v. Hubbert, 595 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgilio Penaloza appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgilio Penaloza appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penaloza-v-hubbert-ca4-2015.