Pena v. TAMPA MAID FOODS, INC.

972 So. 2d 1043, 2008 WL 182254
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 2008
Docket1D07-4535
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 972 So. 2d 1043 (Pena v. TAMPA MAID FOODS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pena v. TAMPA MAID FOODS, INC., 972 So. 2d 1043, 2008 WL 182254 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

972 So.2d 1043 (2008)

Nelis PENA, Petitioner,
v.
TAMPA MAID FOODS, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. 1D07-4535.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 23, 2008.

Harold E, Barker, Lakeland, for Petitioner.

Charles E. Bentley of Boswell & Dunlap, LLP, Bartow, for. Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Because respondents correctly and commendably concede error, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED, and the order of the judge of compensation claims is quashed. The JCC shall authorize claimant to undergo a psychiatric examination by an independent medical examiner at the employer/carrier's expense.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guidry v. State
972 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
972 So. 2d 1043, 2008 WL 182254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pena-v-tampa-maid-foods-inc-fladistctapp-2008.