Pena v. State
80 S.W. 1014, 46 Tex. Crim. 458, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of fornication, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $60. The indictment charged appellant with adultery. He insists that inasmuch as he was charged with adultery, he could not be convicted of fornication. In this contention ■he is correct. See Crosgrove v. State, 39 S. W. Rep., 367. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pena v. State, 80 S.W. 1014, 46 Tex. Crim. 458, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152 (Tex. 1904).
80 S.W. 1014 (Pena v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cosgrove v. State
39 S.W. 367 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)