Pena v. City of New York
This text of 204 A.D.2d 296 (Pena v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated December 24, 1991, which granted the motion of the defendant M & S Shillman, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant M & S Shillman, Inc., was liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Lorenzo Pena (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 296, 614 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pena-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1994.