Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pena v. City of New York

Pena v. City of New York

204 A.D.2d 296, 614 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pena v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 233 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated December 24, 1991, which granted the motion of the defendant M & S Shillman, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant M & S Shillman, Inc., was liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Lorenzo Pena (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pena v. City of New York, 204 A.D.2d 296, 614 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 296 (Pena v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.