Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 11, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00998·Unknown

Opinion

aca] DOCUMENT □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:. : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE FILED: __ 6/11/2025 - SANDRA MARIEL PENA DE LA ROSA, Plaintiff, 25-CV-00998 (SN) -against- ORDER LOVELY BEAUTY 167 CORP., et al., Defendants. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □ ------------------X

SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: In this Fair Labor Standards Act case, the parties settled the case at mediation. ECF No. 18. The parties have consented to my jurisdiction. ECF No. 20. By June 25, 2025, the parties are ORDERED to submit the executed settlement agreement and a cover letter stating why the Court should approve the settlement. The cover letter should address the factors set forth in Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332 (S.D.N-Y. 2012), and other case law evaluating settlements under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The settlement agreement shall be filed publicly on ECF unless a party can establish a basis for sealing these documents under the standard set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). SO ORDERED.

SARAH NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: June 11, 2025 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp. (Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.
900 F. Supp. 2d 332 (S.D. New York, 2012)