Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co.

66 F.2d 657, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 1933
DocketNo. 5055
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 66 F.2d 657 (Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co., 66 F.2d 657, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746 (3d Cir. 1933).

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this ease, a suit to recover alleged damages caused by the defendant not drilling a well on premises leased for gas and oil, the court, refusing a new trial, entered judgment for reasons stated in its opinion printed above for the defendant. Whereupon the plaintiff took this appeal.

The facts in the case, the pertinent writings, and the questions involved are set forth in detail in such opinion. After a study of the record, we find ourselves in accord with the holdings of the trial judge, and we avoid needless repetition by adopting his opinion as the opinion of this court.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fogle v. Feazel
10 So. 2d 695 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Fite v. Miller
187 So. 650 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 F.2d 657, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pen-o-tex-oil-leasehold-co-v-pittsburgh-western-oil-co-ca3-1933.