Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co.

Third Circuit

Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co.

66 F.2d 657, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 23, 1933·No. No. 5055·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this ease, a suit to recover alleged damages caused by the defendant not drilling a well on premises leased for gas and oil, the court, refusing a new trial, entered judgment for reasons stated in its opinion printed above for the defendant. Whereupon the plaintiff took this appeal.

The facts in the case, the pertinent writings, and the questions involved are set forth in detail in such opinion. After a study of the record, we find ourselves in accord with the holdings of the trial judge, and we avoid needless repetition by adopting his opinion as the opinion of this court.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this ease, a suit to recover alleged damages caused by the defendant not drilling a well on premises leased for gas and oil, the court, refusing a new trial, entered judgment for reasons stated in its opinion printed above for the defendant. Whereupon the plaintiff took this appeal.

The facts in the case, the pertinent writings, and the questions involved are set forth in detail in such opinion. After a study of the record, we find ourselves in accord with the holdings of the trial judge, and we avoid needless repetition by adopting his opinion as the opinion of this court.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co., 66 F.2d 657, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746 (3d Cir. 1933).

Pincite

66 F.2d 657 (Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Pittsburgh Western Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related