Pemigewasset Bank v. Burnham

5 N.H. 275
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedNovember 15, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 N.H. 275 (Pemigewasset Bank v. Burnham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pemigewasset Bank v. Burnham, 5 N.H. 275 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1830).

Opinion

By the Court.

It is clear, from the language of the statute, that an attachment of real estate is not complete till copies of the writ and the return are left with the town clerk. Indeed, the leaving of the copies with the clerk constitutes the attachment.

But we see nothing in the nature of the act of leaving the copies with the town clerk, which renders it essential that it should be done by the sheriff himself.

There are cases, in which the precise minute when the. copies are left may be material, and in such cases the sheriff must state in his return the precise time ; for the time is to be determined by his return. 13 Mass. Rep. 529, Shove v. Dow. And in such a case, perhaps it may be neccessary, that the sheriff deliver the copies himself, as otherwise he might not be able to return the true time.

But where it is only necessary to state in the return, that the copies were left with the clerk on a particular day, we see no reason why the attachment may not be as well made by sending the copies to the town clerk, as by a delivery of the copies by the sheriff himself. And ■we are of opinion that in this case there must be

Judgment for the defendants

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kittredge v. Emerson
15 N.H. 227 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.H. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pemigewasset-bank-v-burnham-nhsuperct-1830.