Pemberton v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 7, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00568·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | PAMELA PEMBERTON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00568-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 14 | LONG DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, L.L.C., (ECF No. 27) ° Defendant. 16 17 On May 6, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. 18 (ECF No. 27.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. 19 | See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to assign a district judge to this 21} case for the purpose of closing the case and then to close this case. 22 93 [T IS SO ORDERED. **) Dated: _May 7, 2021 heey — 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pemberton v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pemberton v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. (Pemberton v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)