Pemberton v. Lewis

90 S.E.2d 245, 243 N.C. 188, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 548
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 30, 1955·No. 597·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Denny, J.

It seems to be settled in this jurisdiction that a judgment of nonsuit is not res judicata as to a second action unless it is made to appear that the second action is between the same parties, on the same' cause of action, and upon substantially the same evidence. Craver v. Spaugh, 227 N.C. 129, 41 S.E. 2d 82; Batson v. Laundry, 206 N.C. 371, 174 S.E. 90; Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N.C. 235, 151 S.E. 266.

Ordinarily, a motion to dismiss an action on the plea of res judicata will not be allowed on the pleadings alone. Craver v. Spaugh, supra; Buchanan v. Oglesby, 207 N.C. 149, 176 S.E. 281; Dix-Downing v. White, 206 N.C. 567, 174 S.E. 451; Batson v. Laundry, supra; Hampton v. Spinning Co., supra.

Moreover, the court below found as a fact that the allegations in the-complaint in the present action are substantially different in material aspects from the allegations of the complaint in the former action. Furthermore, the evidence to be considered on such motion may not be limited to the evidence that was adduced in the former trial, but contemplates a consideration of all the evidence adduced in support of the allegations of the respective complaints. It is only by a consideration of all such evidence that the court may determine whether or not the evidence in both trials was substantially the same. Therefore, we thinlc the motion interposed below was prematurely made. Buchanan v. Oglesby, supra. Likewise, we hold that this appeal is premature and should be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pemberton v. Lewis, 90 S.E.2d 245, 243 N.C. 188, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 548 (N.C. 1955).

90 S.E.2d 245 (Pemberton v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powell v. Cross
150 S.E.2d 59 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Walker v. Story
124 S.E.2d 113 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Hayes v. Ricard
112 S.E.2d 123 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. Hunt
112 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Poindexter v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WINSTON SALEM
101 S.E.2d 682 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Hunt v. Bradshaw
145 F. Supp. 322 (M.D. North Carolina, 1956)