Pember v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pember v. New York State Division of Human Rights

50 A.D.2d 903, 377 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 903 (Pember v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pember v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 50 A.D.2d 903, 377 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 22, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated January 22, 1974, dismissing, after an investigation and upon a finding that no probable cause existed, petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice, relating to employment, because of age. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. There is no evidence that the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board was arbitrary, capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 7, par e). In our opinion the record on this proceeding demonstrates that the complaint lacked merit as a matter of law (see State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Nor is there anything in the record which, in the interest of justice, requires this court to remit the matter to the State division for further proceedings. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 22, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated January 22, 1974, dismissing, after an investigation and upon a finding that no probable cause existed, petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice, relating to employment, because of age. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. There is no evidence that the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board was arbitrary, capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 7, par e). In our opinion the record on this proceeding demonstrates that the complaint lacked merit as a matter of law (see State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Nor is there anything in the record which, in the interest of justice, requires this court to remit the matter to the State division for further proceedings. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 903, 377 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pember-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack