Pelzer v. Z. L. Parmelee & Co.

97 F. 992, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3361
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
DecidedOctober 30, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 F. 992 (Pelzer v. Z. L. Parmelee & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelzer v. Z. L. Parmelee & Co., 97 F. 992, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3361 (circtsdca 1899).

Opinion

WELLBORN, District Judge.

For reasons assigned in an opinion this day filed in Pelzer v. Meyberg (C. C.; No. 865) 97 Fed. 969, the demurrer in the suit first above mentioned is sustained, and the complainant allowed 30 days to amend, if it shall be so advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pelzer v. Meyberg
97 F. 969 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. 992, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelzer-v-z-l-parmelee-co-circtsdca-1899.