Pelz v. Pelz
This text of 182 A.D. 923 (Pelz v. Pelz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order, -without costs, and deny the motion to punish the defendant for a contempt, without costs, first, on authority of Moore v. Moore (142 App. Div. 459) and People ex rel. Ready v. Walsh (132 id. 462); and second, on authority of Wulff v. Wulff (151 id. 22), inasmuch as the record indicates that defendant is a fugitive, and “ the court will not do a futile thing.” Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Rich, J., concurred upon the second ground only, and dissented from the first ground, upon the dissenting opinion of Laughlin, J., in Moore v. Moore (supra). Order reversed, without costs, and motion to punish defendant for contempt denied, without costs, first, on authority of Moore v. Moore (142 App. Div. 459) and People ex rel. Ready v. Walsh (132 id. 462); and second, on authority of Wulff v, Wulff (151 id. 22), inasmuch as the record indicates that defendant is a fugitive, and “ the court will not do a futile thing.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 A.D. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelz-v-pelz-nyappdiv-1918.