Peltret v. Frank

4 P. 885, 66 Cal. 34, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 673
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1884
DocketNo. 8,266
StatusPublished

This text of 4 P. 885 (Peltret v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peltret v. Frank, 4 P. 885, 66 Cal. 34, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 673 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

The Court.

Appeal from orders made after judgment. In addition to a copy of the judgment roll, the transcript contains what purports to be copies of affidavits, and of the official reporter’s notes of the oral evidence of two witnesses. These are not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, nor are they identified by a certificate of the judge, or otherwise, as having been used or considered on the hearing of any motion in the case. Under the circumstances, we cannot consider any thing except the judgment-roll, and as that discloses no ground for a reversal of the orders appealed from, they are affirmed. (Baker v. Snyder, 58 Cal. 617; Angell v. Delmas, 60 Cal. 254; Walsh v. Hutchings, 60 Cal. 228, and White v. Longmire, 63'Cal. 232.)

Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Snyder
58 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Walsh v. Hutchings
60 Cal. 228 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Angell v. Delmas
60 Cal. 254 (California Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P. 885, 66 Cal. 34, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peltret-v-frank-cal-1884.