Peltret v. Frank

4 P. 885, 66 Cal. 34, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 673
California Supreme Court·Decided October 21, 1884·No. No. 8,266·Published

Opinion

The Court.

Appeal from orders made after judgment. In addition to a copy of the judgment roll, the transcript contains what purports to be copies of affidavits, and of the official reporter’s notes of the oral evidence of two witnesses. These are not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, nor are they identified by a certificate of the judge, or otherwise, as having been used or considered on the hearing of any motion in the case. Under the circumstances, we cannot consider any thing except the judgment-roll, and as that discloses no ground for a reversal of the orders appealed from, they are affirmed. (Baker v. Snyder, 58 Cal. 617; Angell v. Delmas, 60 Cal. 254; Walsh v. Hutchings, 60 Cal. 228, and White v. Longmire, 63'Cal. 232.)

Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peltret v. Frank, 4 P. 885, 66 Cal. 34, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 673 (Cal. 1884).

4 P. 885 (Peltret v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Snyder
58 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Walsh v. Hutchings
60 Cal. 228 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Angell v. Delmas
60 Cal. 254 (California Supreme Court, 1882)