Peltier v. Metts

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 3, 2009
• Docket: 09-1173
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1173

BRIAN E. PELTIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOBE C. METTS, MD; MUSC; TENET SOUTH CAROLINA, d/b/a East Cooper Regional Medical Center; UNIVERSITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES; J. C. NICHOLSON, JR., Circuit Court Judge State of SC; FLORIDA MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; SANDRA J. SENN; ROBIN L. JACKSON; THE LAW FIRM OF SANDRA J. SENN; ROBERT H. HOOD, JR.; HOOD LAW FIRM, LLC; LINDSAY K. SMITH- YANCEY; DOUGLAS PRATT-THOMAS; THE LAW FIRM OF PRATT-THOMAS WALKER; HUGH W. BUYCK; DARREN K. SANDERS; ALL DEFENDANTS INSURANCE COMPANIES, tbd at discovery phase of this trial; THOMAS E. KEENE, MD; RHONDA RICHARDSON, MUSC affiliation; SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00044-DCN)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brian E. Peltier appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Peltier v. Metts, No. 2:09-cv-00044-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 28,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED