Pelt v. State of Florida

115 So. 544, 94 Fla. 1183
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now adivsed of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court *1184 be, and the same is hereby affirmed, upon the authority of Hunter v. The State, 85 Fla. 91, 95 So. 115.

Wm. C. Hodges, for Plaintiff in Error; Fred H. Davis, Attorney General; Boy Campbell, Assistant, for State.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pelt v. State of Florida, 115 So. 544, 94 Fla. 1183 (Fla. 1928).

115 So. 544 (Pelt v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. State
95 So. 115 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)